Home » Politic News

Will Barack Obama Change the Face of the US Green Economy?

Written By: ppadin on September 22, 2009 18 Comments
Will Barack Obama Change the Face of the US Green Economy?

With the US on the brink of change following Barack Obama’s historic triumph in the presidential election, those in the clean energy space were left considering what this would mean for the US’ burgeoning green economy. In a web video released last week for the Bi-Partisan Governors Global Climate Summit, the President-elect pledged new leadership to address global climate change.

In the speech, posted on YouTube, Obama reaffirmed his positive intentions, stating that there are few challenges facing the world today that are more pressing than tackling climate change.

Obama said, ‘Climate change and our dependence on foreign oil, if left unaddressed, will continue to weaken our economy and threaten our national security.

‘My presidency will mark a new chapter in America’s leadership in climate change that will strengthen our security and create millions of new jobs in the process,’ he added.

In the speech, he reiterated his pre-election plan to invest $150bn over the next ten years to catalyse private efforts to build a clean energy future, and the need to implement clear steps to propel the US to a leading position in terms of new energy resources.

His pledges included establishing annual targets to reduce emissions to their 1990 levels by 2020 and reduce them by an additional 80 per cent by 2050.

‘We will invest in solar power, wind power and next generation biofuels. We will tap nuclear power while making sure it is safe and we will develop clean coal technologies,’ he said in the speech.

For decades, the US has been the world’s largest petroleum consumer. However, a recent report from the Energy Information Administration (EIA) estimated that 58 per cent of all petroleum consumed by the US in 2007 was imported. The long-term implications of this situation were something that Obama appears keen to address. The proposed $150bn investment into homeland energy sources would seem to reflect this commitment.

Obama continued, ‘This investment will not only help us reduce our dependence on foreign oil, making the US more secure, and will not only help us bring about a clean energy future saving the planet, but it also will help us transform our industries and steer our country out of this economic crisis by generating five million new green jobs that pay well and cannot be outsourced.’

Obama also plans to introduce the Cap and Trade Program to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions, which seeks to reduce carbon emissions by the recommended 80 per cent below 1990 levels, by 2050. Through this programme, all pollution credits will be auctioned with approximately $15bn of revenue per year going towards the development of clean energy. In a bid to limit dependency on foreign resources, this $15bn will be reinvested into domestic basic research, technology demonstration and aggressive commercial deployment and clean market creation.

Such a massive commitment would surely pave the way for new investment and future innovation as both industries and individuals clamour to meet this target.

The recent volatility in the price of oil and ensuing record highs have thrust the theme of alternative energy firmly to the fore, with investors paying increasing attention to the sector. In terms of venture capital alone, private investment in the renewable energy space topped $2.6bn in 2007.

The overriding theme in the industry is that the change of leadership will be a positive force.

Jim Pettit of clean energy-focused private equity firm Navitas Capital, believes that despite the financial crisis sweeping the globe, Obama will still play a pivotal role in the expansion of renewable energy. ‘While President-elect Barack Obama is poised to inherit a ton of problems across every dimension of his presidency, we look for the Obama administration to become a strong advocate for a wide array of clean technologies.

‘As a result of policy at the federal level, we believe that Obama sees an enormous opportunity to simultaneously stimulate the economy and improve the environment for future generations,’ he added.

Obama’s policies, however, do raise the question as to whether a critical change can really be implemented and whether the legacy of the past eight years of a Bush presidency can be significantly altered.

Amidst a flurry of economic woes, some have argued that it would be a mistake to place climate change at the top of the agenda in a time of financial difficulty and instability. However, many in the industry feel that the economic downturn will have little long-term effect on renewable energy and clean technologies, reinforcing the profile of this sector as a long-term prospect.

Another challenge facing Obama is that the US must acknowledge that it requires the support of emerging countries such as India and China if it is to make a significant dent in the global carbon footprint.

The Kyoto Protocol calls for developed countries to slash their emissions by five per cent by 2012, yet scientific research suggests that emissions requires an 80 per cent reduction by then if climate change is to be significantly tackled. With even Kyoto’s requirements looking a daunting prospect, Obama faces a stern challenge.

Indeed, Obama himself recognises that the US alone cannot solve this pressing concern. While he acknowledged that it was time for the US to set the precedent, he added that countries such as China and Brazil would have to follow suit with their own binding commitments. To that end, Obama, alongside Vice President-elect Joe Biden, has pledged to re-engage with the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and bring all the major emitting nations together to develop effective emissions reductions efforts.

With the US known for its unashamedly consumer lifestyle, Obama understands only too well how crucial it is to tackle the issue of energy consumption if the new administration is to show a deep commitment to change. To this end, fuel economy standards are set to increase by four per cent each year while one million hybrid cars are expected on the road by 2015.

The next president expects ten per cent of all electricity to be derived from renewable sources by 2012. With Barack Obama yet to step into the White House, we can only speculate whether his goals will be realised. It remains to be seen whether the US can lead the way in the world’s efforts to tackle climate change.

Copyright © 2009 newnet

Watch the video related to Obama

SHOCK UNCOVERED: Obama IN HIS OWN WORDS admitting his Health Care Plan will ELIMINATE private insurance OBAMA AND THE DEMOCRATS HEATH CARE GOAL IS A PUBLIC OPTION THAT WILL ULTIMATELY ELIMINATE PRIVATE EMPLOYER PROVIDED INSURANCE (Obama SEIU forum on health care 3/24/07, Barney Frank, Jan Schakowsky all admitting a public option will put the private insurance industry out of business) NAKED EMPEROR NEWS (Hat tip to Morgen at Verum Serum for the 2003 clip)

Help answer the question about Obama

What solutions does Obama have for the US Economy that will actually work?
Our economy tanked because there was too much easy money and easy credit available. So far the solutions are "more easy money and easy credit".

Does Obama have any proposals that will actually benefit the US economy long-term?

Note: This question is about Obama. Not Bush. Not McCain.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Digg this!Add to del.icio.us!Stumble this!Add to Techorati!Share on Facebook!Seed Newsvine!Reddit!

18 Responses to “Will Barack Obama Change the Face of the US Green Economy?”

  1. Steph:] on: 22 September 2009 at 2:52 pm

    Personally, I think Obama is going through a lot, trying to save the country after what Bush did to it.

    Still, I respect your opinion but, think of how hard it is to be president. Think of how hard it is to save an ENTIRE country through depression. FDR could only do it because he had extreme help from his wife where as Obama's wife doesn't really play the same role as Elenor.

  2. kevinjones238 on: 22 September 2009 at 3:21 pm

    I am a man. I have no problem admitting a wrong. So, I would like to submit an apology not only to you SufferInJuly, but to all of the contributors on this page. The comment that was made as a rebuttal to paintballersman’s “nigger” tirade could have been avoided. I am a black man and proud of my race. I was offended by the comment and decided to submit a reply that would serve as a reflection of my anger. Poor judgement on my behalf. Have a good day.

  3. Amers=) on: 22 September 2009 at 3:46 pm

    I will Not Vote for Obama

    You cannot tell me that a man who calls Rev. Wright His mentor, who listened to his teachings for 20 years has not been influenced by this teaching that teaches that the white race has engineered the HIV Virus to commit genocide against the Black race, that is a baseless accusation with no truth to it at all.

    Watch This.

    http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/video.aspx?v=Q4IrVrkU

  4. SufferInJuly on: 22 September 2009 at 4:01 pm

    No one chooses their parents. Pride in race is meaningless, divisive & belligerent. One may as
    well have pride in possessing ear lobes & nostrils.

  5. SufferInJuly on: 22 September 2009 at 4:29 pm

    Your parents have been humiliated by you.

  6. Ann Coulter's Man Hand on: 22 September 2009 at 5:36 pm

    i agree in most inner cities community organizers mean more to the city then most mayors and governors, and i wonder how most people in here will be after visiting a city like that i think they will change the views on community organizers

  7. Theo N on: 24 September 2009 at 12:22 am

    It's only a political move; forced to reject Wright due to adverse public opinion. If he weren't running for president, he would still be a member of his church and being mentored by him. As far as his black supporters are concerned; unless he flat-out changes his color, he'll still get their usual racially motivated 90+ % votes.

  8. albertmarriner on: 24 September 2009 at 3:38 am

    too bad for ted kennedy that the media and all the liberal nutjobs are not the one’s judging him now!!

  9. SufferInJuly on: 24 September 2009 at 4:31 am

    How queerly, & querulously, gay you are.

  10. DesiDani(still waiting for 12am) on: 24 September 2009 at 11:14 am

    Casualities of war. A war where we are fighting who we should be, not fighting in Iraq.

  11. Mike g on: 24 September 2009 at 6:02 pm

    zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz………..

  12. poet1b on: 24 September 2009 at 6:14 pm

    The only way I would support a joint ticket is with Hillary as President and Obama as VP. NOT the other way around.

  13. Merlin on: 24 September 2009 at 7:21 pm

    Merlin you sound like you want him to be president because he's a minority. That's not a good enough reason.

  14. SufferInJuly on: 25 September 2009 at 5:24 am

    Queerly gay you are…

  15. nourbutwatmi on: 25 September 2009 at 8:22 am

    It’s obvious the socialists on the left get their underwear in a bunch whenever the truth is posted. Look at all the negative reds…poor little socialists can’t stand it. Hey, may I suggest that instead of being tortured with the truth, why don’t you try something new and get a job. Yep, that will give you less time to hang on the web and thus reduce your problems with the truth. Who knows it (a job) may even enlighten you to seek a change to your uninformed way of life.

  16. oboma8 on: 25 September 2009 at 3:31 pm

    Notice Obama didn’t address friends of kennedy…know why? Ha Ha Ha… Poor Teddy didn’t have any!

  17. RadioTrunews on: 25 September 2009 at 7:54 pm

    “The Obama family plan is to call up my HHS (Health and Human Services) Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, and my CDC director, and just ask them, what’s your recommendation? And whatever they tell me to do, I will do,” Obama said.

    See my video entitled Obamas to get swine flu vaccine.
    So it shows how much of a puppet Obama is to the global elite after all.
    Quote: ”And whatever they tell me to do, I will do,” Obama said.

    Wow.

  18. jb on: 26 September 2009 at 12:19 am

    Nothing. He never introduced or sponsored any bills. He was just "there."

Leave a Reply:

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  Copyright ©2009 Politic party, All rights reserved.| Powered by WordPress| WPElegance2Col theme by Techblissonline.com